Constitutive Regulation as a Compromise for Disruptive Innovation? The Introduction of Social Dialogue in the French Platform Economy

Archer Buissink

doi:10.71265/24yf0586

Authors

Archer Buissink Utrecht University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-5945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71265/24yf0586

Keywords:

constitutive regulation, platform regulation, France, digital labour platforms, social dialogue, platform work, decommodification, ARPE, platform governance, disruptive technology

Abstract

This article explores how constitutive regulation can function as a response to disruptive innovation, using the French platform regulator ARPE as a case study. While most regulatory approaches to the platform economy rely on adapting existing legal categories, ARPE introduces a novel model based on the creation of new institutional identities and behaviours. Drawing on abductive document analysis, the article examines how constitutive regulation attempts to reconcile the demands of both platform firms and workers by creating new participatory mechanisms without altering independent status of platform workers It critically assesses the partially decommodifying ambitions of this model within the recommodifying pressures of digital capitalism and contributes to theoretical debates on the role of regulation in shaping technological and social transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Archer Buissink, Utrecht University

Archer Buissink is a PhD Candidate at the School of Governance, Utrecht University

References

• Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 13(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211062557

• Ansaloni, M., & Smith, A. (2018). The neo-dirigiste production of French capitalism since 1980: The view from three major industries. French Politics, 16(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-018-0061-1

• Baccaro, L., & Howell, C. (2011). A Common Neoliberal Trajectory: The Transformation of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalism. Politics & Society, 39(4), 521–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329211420082

• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2014). Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12038

• Béthoux, É., & Mias, A. (2021). How does State-led decentralization affect workplace employment relations? The French case in a comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 27(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680119852268

• Bidet, J. (2003). Paradoxes marxiens de la marchandise. Actuel Marx, 34(2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.034.0011

• Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Lenglet, M. (2024). RegTech governing Fintech in France?: The persistence of digital dirigisme. In The Routledge International Handbook of Public Administration and Digital Governance. Routledge.

• de Lacerda Carelli, R., Oliveira, M. Carvalho Sampaio, & Grillo, S. (2021). Concept and criticism of digital labour platforms. Labour & Law Issues, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2421-2695/13110

• Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. John Wiley & Sons.

• Cherry, C. (1973). Regulative Rules and Constitutive Rules. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 23(93), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218059

• Clift, B., & and McDaniel, S. (2021). Capitalist Convergence? European (dis?)Integration and the Post-crash Restructuring of French and European Capitalisms. New Political Economy, 26(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1680963

• Dale, G. (2010). Social Democracy, Embeddedness and Decommodification: On the Conceptual Innovations and Intellectual Affiliations of Karl Polanyi. New Political Economy, 15(3), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903290920

• Defossez, D. (2022). The employment status of food delivery riders in Europe and the UK: Self-employed or worker? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211051833

• Dirringer, J. (2022). Des droits collectifs en trompe-l’œil pour les travailleurs de plateforme: La Revue de l’Ires, N° 106(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.3917/rdli.106.0013

• Doellgast, V., Wagner, I., & O’Brady, S. (2023). Negotiating limits on algorithmic management in digitalised services: Cases from Germany and Norway. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221143044

• Dudley, G., Banister, D., & Schwanen, T. (2017). The Rise of Uber and Regulating the Disruptive Innovator. The Political Quarterly, 88(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12373

• Dukelow, F. (2021). Recommodification and the Welfare State in Re/Financialised Austerity Capitalism: Further Eroding Social Citizenship? Social Policy and Society, 20(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746420000494

• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity.

• Frade, C., & Darmon, I. (2005). New modes of business organization and precarious employment: Towards the recommodification of labour? Journal of European Social Policy, 15(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928705051509

• Franke, M., & Pulignano, V. (2023). Connecting at the edge: Cycles of commodification and labour control within food delivery platform work in Belgium. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12218

• Freedland, M., & Prassl, J. (2017). Employees, workers and the ‘sharing economy’ Changing practices and changing concepts in The United Kingdom. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal, 6(1–2), Article 1–2. https://doi.org/10.20318/sllerj.2017.3922

• Gaudio, G. (2021). Algorithmic Bosses Can’t Lie! How to Foster Transparency and Limit Abuses of the New Algorithmic Managers. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 42(3), 707–742.

• Giustini, D. (2024). ‘You can book an interpreter the same way you order your Uber’: (Re)interpreting work and digital labour platforms. Perspectives, 32(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2298910

• Greer, I. (2016). Welfare reform, precarity and the re-commodification of labour. Work, Employment and Society, 30(1), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015572578

• Guerrien, B. (2003). Marchandisation et théorie économique. Actuel Marx, 34(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.034.0121

• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford University Press.

• Hassel, A., & Özkiziltan, D. (2023). Governing the work-related risks of AI: Implications for the German government and trade unions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221147228

• Holst, H., & Singe, I. (2013). Ungleiche Parallelwelten – Zur Organisation von Arbeit in der Paketzustellung. Arbeits- und Industriesoziologische Studien, 6(2), 41–60.

• Höpner, M., & Waclawczyk, M. (2012). Opportunismus oder Ungewissheit? Die Arbeitgeberhaltungen zum mitbestimmten Aufsichtsrat. Industrielle Beziehungen / The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(3), 314–336.

• Howell, C. (1992). Regulating Labor: The State and Industrial Relations Reform in Postwar France. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s862

• Ilsøe, A., & Söderqvist, C. F. (2023). Will there be a Nordic model in the platform economy? Evasive and integrative platform strategies in Denmark and Sweden. Regulation & Governance, 17(3), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12465

• Inversi, C., Dundon, T., & Buckley, L.-A. (2023). Work in the Gig-Economy: The Role of the State and Non-State Actors Ceding and Seizing Regulatory Space. Work, Employment and Society, 37(5), 1279–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080387

• Jiang, S., Chen, L., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2018). On Ridesharing Competition and Accessibility: Evidence from Uber, Lyft, and Taxi. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’18, 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186134

• Johnston, H., Ergun, O., Schor, J., & Chen, L. (2024). Employment status and the on-demand economy: A natural experiment on reclassification. Socio-Economic Review, 22(1), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad047

• Kluzik, V. (2022). Governing invisibility in the platform economy: Excavating the logics of platform care. Internet Policy Review, 11(1). https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/governing-invisibility-platform-economy-excavating-logics-platform-care

• Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and Its Regulatory Problems. Policy & Internet, 12(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237

• Lanamäki, A., & Tuvikene, T. (2022). Framing digital future: Selective formalization and legitimation of ridehailing platforms in Estonia. Geoforum, 136, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.016

• Lane, J. F. (2018). From ‘moule’ to ‘modulation’: Logics of Deleuzean ‘control’ in recent reforms to French Labour Law. Modern & Contemporary France, 26(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2018.1437126

• Levi-Faur, D. (2017). Regulatory capitalism. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory Theory (pp. 289–302). ANU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.26

• Marx, K. (1990). Capital Volume I. Penguin Classics.

• Merrien, F.-X. (2007). L’État-providence. Presses Universitaires de France.

• Occhiuto, N. (2022). Enabling disruptive innovations: A comparative case study of Uber in New York City, Chicago and San Francisco. Socio-Economic Review, 20(4), 1881–1903. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab056

• Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State. Hutchinson.

• Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209357888

• Pantazatou, K. (2018). Taxation of the Sharing Economy in the European Union. In J. J. Infranca, M. Finck, & N. M. Davidson (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of the Sharing Economy (pp. 368–380). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108255882.028

• Pasquale, F. (2016). Two Narratives of Platform Capitalism Feature: Essays from the Law and Inequality Conference. Yale Law & Policy Review, 35(1), 309–320.

• Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & Dijck, J. van. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://policyreview.info/concepts/platformisation

• Pongratz, H. J. (2023). Plattformarbeit: Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiverweiterung. WSI-Mitteilungen, 76(5), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2023-5-355

• Poulantzas, N. (1976). The Capitalist State: A Reply to Miliband and Laclau. New Left Review, I/95, 63–83.

• Prassl, J., & Risak, M. (2016). Uber, Taskrabbit, and Co.: Platforms as Employers - Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 619–652.

• Ranchordas, S. (2015). Does Sharing Mean Caring: Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, 16(1), 413–476.

• Rehfeldt, U. (2018). Industrial relations in France: From the underdevelopment of collective bargaining to the failure of neocorporatist concertation. Employee Relations, 40(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2017-0033

• Reid-Musson, E., MacEachen, E., Bartel, E., Saunders, R., Meyer, S., & Bigelow, P. (2020). Occupational Safety and the City: Licensing Regulation and Deregulation in the Taxi Sector. Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 75(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.7202/1068717ar

• Rothstein, H., Demeritt, D., Paul, R., Beaussier, A.-L., Wesseling, M., Howard, M., De Haan, M., Borraz, O., Huber, M., & Bouder, F. (2019). Varieties of risk regulation in Europe: Coordination, complementarity and occupational safety in capitalist welfare states. Socio-Economic Review, 17(4), 993–1020. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx029

• Roversi, C. (2010). Constitutive Rules in Context. ARSP: Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 96(2), 223–238.

• Schaupp, S. (2023). Was ist Technopolitik? Aushandlungsarenen in der digitalisierten Arbeitswelt. In Theorien des digitalen Kapitalismus (pp. 326–343). Suhrkamp.

• Schmidt, V. (2003). French capitalism ¬transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society, 32(4), 526–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514032000141693

• Searle, J. R. (2018). Constitutive Rules. Argumenta - Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 4(1), 51–54.

• Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press.

• Sobel, R., Rousseau, S., & Postel, N. (2010). La RSE: Une nouvelle forme de démarchandisation? L’Économie politique, 45(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.3917/leco.045.0083

• Taeihagh, A., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2021). Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12392

• Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 938–953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081

• Todolí-Signes, A. (2021). Spanish riders law and the right to be informed about the algorithm. European Labour Law Journal, 12(3), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525211038327

• Vail, J. (2010). Decommodification and Egalitarian Political Economy. Politics & Society, 38(3), 310–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210373069