Beyond Personhood: The Evolution of Legal Personhood and Its Implications for AI Recognition

Joffrey Baeyaert

doi:10.71265/ssvg8a97

Authors

Joffrey Baeyaert Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71265/ssvg8a97

Keywords:

Legal personhood, Artificial Intelligence, liability, corporate personhood, right-based theory, functionalist model, agency and accoutnability, hybrid legal frameworks, EU AI Act, Governance and ethics

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of legal personhood and explores whether historical precedents—from corporate personhood to environmental legal recognition—can inform frameworks for governing artificial intelligence (AI). By tracing the development of persona ficta in Roman law and subsequent expansions of personhood for corporations, trusts, and environmental entities, the paper reveals how instrumental governance needs rather than inherent moral agency often motivated new legal fictions. These precedents cast light on contemporary debates about extending legal status to AI, particularly as technological systems increasingly operate autonomously and affect human rights, safety, and economic stability. Drawing on rights-based, functionalist, and agency-based theories, the analysis shows that no single approach fully captures AI’s complex profile as both a powerful tool and a non-sentient actor. Instead, a hybrid model is proposed: one that grants AI a limited or context-specific legal recognition in high-stakes domains—such as financial services or medical diagnostics—while preserving ultimate human accountability. The paper concludes that such a carefully bounded status can bridge regulatory gaps in liability and oversight without conferring the broader rights or ethical standing typically afforded to humans or corporations. By integrating case law, international regulations, and emerging scholarship on relational personhood, this study provides a blueprint for policymakers, legal theorists, and technology developers seeking a balanced path that encourages responsible AI innovation while safeguarding public welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Joffrey Baeyaert, Independent Researcher

Joffrey Baeyaert is an independent researcher in AI ethics and governance and a C-level board advisor for European companies.

References

Arstein-Kerslake, A., O’Donnell, E., Kayess, R., & Watson, J. (2021). Relational personhood: a conception of legal personhood with insights from disability rights and environmental law. Griffith Law Review, 30(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.2003744

Banteka, N. (2020). Artificially Intelligent Persons. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3552269

Benson, P., & Kirsch, S. (2018). Capitalist Corporation, the. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1554

Bettetini, M. (2023). Finzioni a fin di bene: la persona ficta, l’inganno artistico contro la menzogna come tradimento. Mediaevalia Textos e Estudos. https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a13

Bieluk, J. (2020). River as a Legal Person. , 29, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.2.11-23.

Bottomley, D., & Thaldar, D. (2023). Liability for harm caused by AI in healthcare: an overview of the core legal concepts. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1297353

Bowie, N. (2019). Corporate Personhood v. Corporate Statehood. .

Buiten, M., Streel, A., & Peitz, M. (2021). EU Liability Rules for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3817520

Burylo, Y. (2022). LEGAL PERSONHOOD OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS: TO BE OR NOT TO BE?.http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2022/2/2.pdf

Callier, M., & Callier, H. (2019). BLAME IT ON THE MACHINE: A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LIABILITY IN AN AI WORLD.

Cho, J., & Tsche, K. (2024). A Study on the Legal Status and Legal Subjectivity of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Kyung Hee Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.15539/khlj.59.3.4

Cupp, R.L., Litigating Nonhuman Animal Legal Personhood (May 9, 2018). 50 Texas Tech Law Review 573 (2018), Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017/10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2957205 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2957205

Dremliuga, R., Kuznetcov, P., & Mamychev, A. (2019). Criteria for Recognition of AI as a Legal Person. Journal of Politics and Law. https://doi.org/10.5539/JPL.V12N3P105

European Commission. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Act, COM(2021) 206 final.

Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206

European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts (COM(2021) 206 final).

Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206

European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive) (COM(2022) 496 final).

Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022PC0496

European Commission. (2025). Commission work programme 2025: Moving forward together – A Bolder, Simpler, Faster Union (COM(2025) 45 final). Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/f80922dd-932d-4c4a-a18c-d800837fbb23_en?filename=COM_2025_45_1_EN.pdf

European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending certain Union legislative acts (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 1689, 12 July 2024. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Franceschini, M. (2022). Traditional Conceptions of the Legal Person and Nonhuman Animals. Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192590

Hacker, P. (2022). The European AI Liability Directives - Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future. ArXiv, abs/2211.13960. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.13960

Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Legal Personhood for AI?. Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198860877.003.0009

Jowitt, J. (2020). Assessing contemporary legislative proposals for their compatibility with a natural law case for AI legal personhood. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 499 - 508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00979-z

Kim, D. (2023). A few thoughts on the legal personhood of artificial intelligence. The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun University. https://doi.org/10.18189/isicu.2023.30.1.165

Kurki, V. (2019a). A Short History of the Right-Holding Person. A Theory of Legal Personhood. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844037.003.0002

Kurki, V. (2019b). A Theory of Legal Personhood. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844037.001.0001

Kurki, V. (2021a). Can Nature Hold Rights? It's Not as Easy as You Think. Transnational Environmental Law, 11, 525 - 552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000358

Kurki, V. (2021b). Legal Personhood and Animal Rights. Journal of Animal Ethics, 11, 47 - 62. https://doi.org/10.5406/JANIMALETHICS.11.1.0047

Kurki, V. (2023). Legal Personhood. . https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025614

Laukyte, M. (2019). AI as a Legal Person. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326701.

Leung (2019) The approach for ascertaining a trustee’s duties and liabilities, effectiveness of anti-Bartlett provisions, and equitable compensation for breach of trust or fiduciary duty: Zhang Hong Li & Ors v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd & Ors [2019] HKCFA 45, Trusts & Trustees, Volume 26, Issue 3, April 2020, Pages 235–245, https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaa005

Lima, G., Cha, M., Jeon, C., & Park, K. (2020). Explaining the Punishment Gap of AI and Robots. ArXiv, abs/2003.06507

Magee, B. (2019). Impersonal Personhood: Crafting a Coherent Theory of the Corporate Entity. Cornell Law Review, 104, 497-527.

Mahoney, J. (2023). Corporate Personhood and Fiduciary Duties as Critical Constructs in Developing Stakeholder Management Theory and Corporate Purpose. Strategy Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0191

Maloney, M. (2018). Environmental law: Changing the legal status of nature: Recent developments and future possibilities. LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal, 78.

McDonald, L. (2023). AI Systems and Liability: An Assessment of the Applicability of Strict Liability & A Case for Limited Legal Personhood for AI. St Andrews Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v3i1.2645

Mik, E. (2020). AI as a Legal Person?. Mechanical Engineering eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3616732

Militsyna, K. (2022). Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligence: Pro, Contra, Abstain?. Teisė. https://www.journals.vu.lt/teise/article/view/24839/25986

Miller, M. (2019). Environmental Personhood and Standing for Nature: Examining the Colorado River case. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 17, 13.

Naidoo, M. (2022). AI and Legal Personhood: An African Perspective. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3539548

Naidoo, M. (2023). What does it mean to be an agent?. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1273470

Nakazora, M. (2023). Environmental Law With Non-Human Features in India: Giving Legal Personhood to the Ganges. South Asia Research, 43, 172 - 191. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280231163094

Nowik, P. (2021). Electronic personhood for artificial intelligence in the workplace. Comput. Law Secur. Rev., 42, 105584. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2021.105584

Nurudeen, M., Latilo, A., Imosemi, H., & Imosemi, Q. (2024). Comparative legal frameworks for regulating artificial intelligence: A model for harmonizing AI laws in Latin America and Africa. Global Journal of Research in Multidisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.58175/gjrms.2024.2.1.0038

Oh, J. (2023). Legal relations related to Artificial Intelligence. LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY. https://doi.org/10.34267/cbstl.2023.14.2.143.

Paliewicz, N. S. (2019). How Trains Became People: Southern Pacific Railroad Co.’s Networked Rhetorical Culture and the Dawn of Corporate Personhood. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 43(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859918810383

Pardo, M. (2023). Legal Personhood for Animals: Has Science Made Its Case?. Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142339

Pelloso, C. (2018). Serviles personae in Roman Law: “Paradox” or “Otherness”?. Journal of Global Slavery, 3(1-2), 92-128. https://doi.org/10.1163/2405836X-00301006

Powell, D. (2020). Autonomous Systems as Legal Agents: Directly by the Recognition of Personhood or Indirectly by the Alchemy of Algorithmic Entities. Duke law and technology review, 18, 306-331.

Pusztahelyi, R. (2021). Towards a European AI liability system. Multidiszciplináris tudományok. https://doi.org/10.35925/j.multi.2021.5.35

Reyes, C. (2020). Autonomous Corporate Personhood. Comparative Law eJournal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3776481

Ripken, S. (2019). Constitutional Dimensions of the Corporate Person: Corporate Free Speech. Corporate Personhood. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241366.005

Saad, A. (2019). Corporate Personhood: Possibilities for Progressive, Trans-Doctrinal Legal Reform. Law & Society: Public Law - Corporations eJournal.

Schanzenbach, M., & Sitkoff, R. (2020). Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee. SRPN: CSR & Process Issues (Topic). https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3244665

Schwemer, S.F., Tomada, L., & Pasini, T. (2021). Legal AI Systems in the EU's proposed Artificial Intelligence Act. ASAIL/LegalAIIA@ICAIL.

Sen, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems: A Legal Perspective on Granting Personhood and Implications of Such a Decision. DME Journal of Law. https://doi.org/10.53361/dmejl.v4i01.03

Sharkey, C. (2024). A Products Liability Framework for AI. Science and Technology Law Review. https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v25i2.12763

Sitkoff, R. (2018). Fiduciary Principles in Trust Law. Employee Benefits. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190634100.013.3

Strang, V. (2019). The Rights of the River: Water, Culture and Ecological Justice. Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13905-6_8

Teubner, G. (2018). Digital Personhood? The Status of Autonomous Software Agents in Private Law. . https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3177096

Van Eck, M., & Agbeko, F. (2023). ELECTRONIC PERSONS IN CONTRACTS. Obiter. https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v44i4.17507

Virgo, G. (2020). 17. Liability for Breach of Trust and Fiduciary Duty. The Principles of Equity & Trusts.

Wagner, G. (2021). Liability for Artificial Intelligence: A Proposal of the European Parliament. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3886294

Wang, C., & Wang, J. (2023). The construction of artificial intelligence private legal personality system. Legal Science in China and Russia. https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2022.5.086-092

Watson, S. (2018). The corporate legal person. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 19, 137 - 166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2018.1435951

Zheng, Y. (2023). Redefining Rights in the Age of AI: Philosophical Perspectives in Shaping the Future of International Human Rights Law. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/16/20231124

Zikun, I. (2023). Culpa levissima and Substitution under Trust Administration. Lex Russica. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.205.12.021-031