The Use of Facial Recognition Technologies by Law Enforcement Authorities in the US and the EU: Towards a Convergence on Regulation?

Xavier Tracol

doi:10.71265/1ym02j10

Authors

Xavier Tracol EUROJUST

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71265/1ym02j10

Keywords:

facial recognition, US, EU, moratorium, prohibition/ban, regulation

Abstract

Law enforcement authorities have been using facial recognition technologies for many years in both the US and the EU. Some US legislators adopted bans and/or moratoriums whilst other US legislators adopted nuanced regulations about such use. The EU legislature considered adopting a ban of the use of live or real-time facial recognition technologies by law enforcement authorities in publicly accessible spaces. The EU legislature however ended up adopting a partial ban which provides for many broad exceptions. In this context, the US and the EU share a common interest in sharing experience about regulating the use of facial recognition technologies by law enforcement authorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Xavier Tracol, EUROJUST

Dr. Xavier Tracol is senior Legal Officer at EUROJUST. The views expressed herein are those of the author in his personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect those of EUROJUST or the European Union in general.

References

Asress Adimi Gikay, ‘Regulating Use by Law Enforcement Authorities of Live Facial Recognition Technology in Public Spaces: an Incremental Approach’ (2023) 82(3) Cambridge Law Journal 414.

Daragh Murray, ‘Police Use of Retrospective Facial Recognition Technology: A Step Change in Surveillance Capability Necessitating an Evolution of the Human Rights Law Framework’ (2023) Modern Law Review https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12862.

European Data Protection Supervisor and EDPB, ‘Joint Opinion 5/2021’ (18 June 2021) https://www.edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2021-06/edpb-edps_joint_opinion_ai_regulation_en.pdf.

European Data Protection Board, ‘Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement’ (12 May 2022) https://www.edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2023-05/edpb_guidelines_202304_frtlawenforcement_v2_en.pdf.

Matt O’Brien, ‘Microsoft joins Amazon, IBM in pausing face scans for police’ (AP News, 11 June 2020) https://apnews.com/article/e5dfcb8c0b003c1134137d33add4c301.

South Wales Police, Response to the Court of Appeal judgment on the use of facial recognition technology (11 August 2020) https://www.south-wales.police.uk/news/south-wales/news/2020/response-to-the-court-of-appeal-judgment-on-the-use-of-facial-recognition-technology/.

US Commission on Civil Rights, Annual Statutory Enforcement Report on the Civil Rights Implications of the Federal Use of Facial Recognition Technology (19 September 2024) https://www.usccr.gov/files/2024-09/civil-rights-implications-of-frt_0.pdf.

US Government Accountability Office, ‘Facial Recognition Technology: Federal Law Enforcement Agency Efforts Related to Civil Rights and Training’ (7 March 2024) GAO-24-107372.

Xavier Tracol, The use of facial recognition technologies by law enforcement authorities in the US and the EU: towards a convergence on regulation? (2025) Technology and Regulation 289.