Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
logo
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Search

Search

Advanced filters
Published After
Published Before

Search Results

Found one item.
  • Constructing Security for the Twin Transitions The Tragedy of EU Law at the Intersection of Climate and AI Governance

    Barrie Sander
    91-115
    30-03-2026

    As the European Union (EU) continues to pursue a strategy of twinning the green and digital transitions, heightened expectations have been invested in the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to combat climate change. Importantly, relying on AI to address the climate crisis gives rise to a range of security concerns. Yet, only rarely have such concerns been the focus of critical attention. Adopting a narrative theoretical lens, this paper critically examines the construction and contestation of security within three EU regulatory frameworks at the intersection of climate and AI governance – the Critical Raw Materials Act, the AI Act, and the Digital Services Act. The paper argues that these regulations fall within a genre of tragic governance. Each regulation romantically positions the EU as a heroic values-based actor, driven by green, rights-based and democratic ambitions. In practice, however, these ideals are undermined by the fatal flaw of restricted vision – security threats at the intersection of climate and AI governance are framed and addressed in terms that end up legitimating harmful dynamics of exploitation against local communities affected by resource mining, people on the move, and digital activists, whilst neglecting the logics of overconsumption, border externalisation, and data extractive informational capitalism that render such actors more susceptible to control and domination than protection and empowerment. At the same time, the paper also identifies a number of footholds within each regulation that provide a basis for dominant understandings of security to be contested. While such footholds are unlikely to completely overturn the dominant security narratives that underpin these regulations, they offer possibilities to construct counter-narratives that resist their inevitability – potentially creating space for future reimaginings of EU law beyond its tragic present.

1 - 1 of 1 items

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
Most Read Articles
  • Beyond Personhood: The Evolution of Legal Personhood and Its Implications for AI Recognition
    6306
  • Towards Planet Proof Computing: Law and Policy of Data Centre Sustainability in the European Union
    4024
  • Reforming Copyright Law for AI-Generated Content: Copyright Protection, Authorship and Ownership
    2838
  • The Use of Facial Recognition Technologies by Law Enforcement Authorities in the US and the EU: Towards a Convergence on Regulation?
    2368
  • Codes of Conduct in the Digital Services Act: Functions, Benefits & Concerns
    2152

Published by Open Press TiU | Supported by Openjournals
Privacy Policy | Responsible Disclosure Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DOI: 10.26116/techreg | ISSN: 2666-139X

More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.