‘Slow libraries’ and ‘Cultural AI':: Reassessing technology regulation in the context of digitalised cultural heritage data

Vicky Breemen; Kelly Breemen

doi:10.71265/fxkhy005

Authors

Vicky Breemen Utrecht University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4481-3164
Kelly Breemen Utrecht University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71265/fxkhy005

Keywords:

cultural AI, bias, epistemic dominance, inclusivity, value based regulation, law & humanities

Abstract

Cultural heritage institutions (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums; CHIs or GLAM) increasingly experiment with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in epistemological tools for unlocking their collections. The use of AI poses both opportunities and risks, a notable risk being bias and silencing non-dominant perspectives. It is therefore time to rethink the design and regulation of AI. With the input of histories of, and developments in, collecting and unlocking cultural heritage, and various theories on cultural AI, regulation by design, and value alignment, this paper applies a law & humanities perspective to examine ‘cultural AI’ and ‘slow archives’ approaches in view of our envisaged output: the contours of a conceptual framework for the value-based regulation by design of culturally sensitive, fair and insightful AI in GLAM practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jasmine Aguilera, ‘Another Word for ‘Illegal Alien’ at the Library of Congress: Contentious’ The New York Times (New York, 12 July 2016)

Jane Anderson, ‘Negotiating Who Owns Penobscot Culture’ (2018) 91 Anthropological Quarterly 267

Sara Bannerman, International Copyright and Access to Knowledge (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2016)

Ryan Brate e.a., ’Capturing Contentiousness: Constructing the Contentious Terms in Context Corpus’ (2021) Proceedings of the 11th Knowledge Capture Conference 17

Kelly Breemen and Vicky Breemen, ‘Human Rights Principles as Normative ‘Fairness’ Tools in the Context of IP and (Access to) Indigenous Peoples’ Heritage via Digital Libraries’ in Daniel Gervais (ed.), Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property (Edward Elgar 2020)

JM Breemen, Legal Shape-shifting. On the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions and Crossing the Boundaries between Copyright, Cultural Heritage and Human Rights Law (1st edn Eleven 2021)

Kathleen Burns ea, ‘Indigenous Librarianship’ in MJ Bates and MN Maack (eds), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (3rd edn, Taylor and Francis 2009)

Brendan Ciecko, ‘AI Sees What? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Machine Vision for Museum Collections’ (2020) 5 The Museum Review < https://themuseumreviewjournal.wordpress.com/2020/04/23/tmr_vol5no1_ciecko/ > accessed 9 April 2024

Kimberly Christen, ‘Balancing Act: The Creation and Circulation of Indigenous Knowledge and Culture Inside and Outside the Legal Frame’ in Sean Pager and Adam Candeub (eds.), Traditional Culture in the Internet Age, Cheltenham (Edward Elgar 2012)

Kimberly Christen, ‘Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters’, Journal of Western Archives (2015) 6 (1) Journal of Western Archives < https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/vol6/iss1/3/ > accessed 9 April 2024

Kimberly Christen and Jane Anderson, ‘Toward Slow Archives’ (2019) 19 Archival Science 87

Council for Culture and the Advisory Committee on the National Policy Framework for Colonial Collections ‘Colonial collections and recognition of injustice’ (2020)

Nicole Crawford and Darrell Jackson, ‘Stealing Culture: Digital Repatriation (A Case Study)’ (2020) 12 University Museums and Collections Journal 77

Cultural AI Lab, Cultural AI – a Lab for Culturally Valued AI https://www.cultural-ai.nl/ accessed 20 May 2024

Cultural AI Lab, Mission and Vision https://www.cultural-ai.nl/missionandvision accessed 20 May 2024

Tom Demeyer, ‘AI in Culture & Society’ (2019) WAAG AI Culture Lab < https://waag.org/nl/article/ai-culture-society/ > accessed 9 April 2024

Sally Engle Merry, ‘Changing Rights, Changing Culture’ in Jane K Cowan, Marie-Bénédicte Dembour and Richard A Wilson (eds), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2001)

Marieke van Erp and Victor de Boer, ‘A Polyvocal and Contextualised Semantic Web’, in Ruben Verborgh, Katja Hose, Heiko Paulheim, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Maria Maleshkova, Oscar Corcho, Petar Ristoski and Mehwish Alam, ESWC 2021: The Semantic Web (Springer 2021)

Europeana, ‘DE-BIAS’ (Europeana Pro) https://pro.europeana.eu/project/de-bias accessed 16 April 2025

Europeana Foundation, AI4Culture – An AI Platform for the Cultural Heritage Data Space (14 November 2022) https://pro.europeana.eu/project/ai4culture-an-ai-platform-for-the-cultural-heritage-data-space accessed 21 May 2024

European Commission, ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)’ COM(2021) 206 final 2021/0106 (COD)

European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, ‘Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for the Cultural and Creative Sectors’ (SMART 2019/0024, 2022)

European Parliament, ‘Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector’ (2020/2017(INI)) (resolution of 19 May 2021 on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector)

Future of Life Institute, ‘Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter’ (2023) https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ pause-giant-ai-experiments/ accessed 24 May 2024

Iason Gabriel, ‘Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment’ (2020) 30 Minds and Machines 411

Seda Gürses, Carmela Troncoso and Claudia Diaz, ‘Engineering Privacy by Design’ [2011] Computers, Privacy & Data Protection

Daniel J Gervais, ‘Spiritual But Not Intellectual? The Protection of Sacred Intangible Traditional Knowledge’ (2003) 11 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 467

Dylan Hadfield-Menell and Gillian K Hadfield, ‘Incomplete Contracting and AI Alignment’ (2019) Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society 417

Gry Hasselbalch, ‘Culture by Design: A Data Interest Analysis of the European AI Policy Agenda’ (2020) 25 First Monday

Carl Hogsden and Emma K Poulter, ‘The Real Other? Museum Objects in Digital Contact Networks’ (2012) 17 Journal of Material Culture 265

The High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, Outcomes of the AI HLEG Workshop of 20 September 2018 < https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/report_of_the_ai_hleg_workshop_on_20_september_2018.pdf > accessed 29 May 2024

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, ‘IFLA-UNESCO Public Library Manifesto 2022’ www.ifla.org/public-library-manifesto/ accessed 5 June 2024

Chris Julien, Tom Demeyer and Stefano Bocconi, Biased-by-default (position paper, Waag 2019)

Koninklijke Bibliotheek, 'Artificial intelligence koppelt honderdduizenden persfoto’s aan krantenartikelen' (16 March 2022) https://www.kb.nl/actueel/nieuws/artificial-intelligence-koppelt-honderdduizenden-persfotos-aan-krantenartikelen accessed 21 May 2024

Mauritz Kop, ‘EU Artificial Intelligence Act: The European Approach to AI’ (2021) 2/2021 Stanford - Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments

Krystiana L Krupa and Kelsey T Grimm, ‘Digital Repatriation as a Decolonizing Practice in the Archaeological Archive’ (2021) 18 Across the Disciplines 47

Tahu Kukutai and John Taylor (eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Toward an Agenda (ANU Press 2016)

Stefan Kulk and Thom Snijders, ‘Casestudy Contentmoderatie door Online Platformen’, in Stefan Kulk and Stijn van Deursen (eds), Juridische Aspecten van Algoritmen die Besluiten Nemen. Een Verkennend Onderzoek (WODC 2020)

Federico Lenzerini, ‘Cultural Identity, Human Rights, and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples’ (2016) 23 Brown Journal of World Affairs 127

Library of Congress, ‘Ancestral Voices: Rights and Access’ https://loc.gov/collections/ ancestral-voices/about-this-collection/rights-and-access/ accessed 24 May 2024

Zheng Liu, ‘Sociological Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Typological Reading’ (2021) 15 (3) Sociology Compass, 1

Local Contexts, ‘Traditional Knowledge (TK) Labels’ https://localcontexts.org/labels/traditional-knowledge-labels/ accessed 24 May 2024

Patrick Meershoek, ‘Besluit Rijksmuseum over Hottentotten en Negers roept Wisselende Reacties op’ (Het Parool, 10 December 2015) < https://tinyurl.com/5xnunhbm > accessed 4 May 2024

Mukurtu, ‘About Mukurtu’ https://mukurtu.org/about/ accessed 24 May 2024

Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen, Return of Cultural Objects: Principles and Process (2019) https://www.tropenmuseum.nl/en/dutch-national-museum-world-cultures-nmvw-announces-principles-claims-colonialcollections accessed 21 May 2024

Wayne Ngata, Hera Ngata-Gibson and Amiria Salmond, 'Te Ataakura: Digital Taonga and Cultural Innovation’ (2012) 17 (3) Journal of Material Culture, 229

Het Parool, ‘Amsterdam Museum doet term ‘Gouden Eeuw’ in de ban’ Het Parool (Amsterdam, 12 September 2019) https://tinyurl.com/2p84fh8a accessed 20 May 2024.

Magdalena Pasikowska-Schnass and Young-Shin. Lim, ‘Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Cultural Heritage and Museums. Complex Challenges and New Opportunities’< https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2023)747120 >

Mathilde Pavis and Andrea Wallace, ‘Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report. Statement on Intellectual Property Rights and Open Access relevant to the Digitization and Restitution of African Cultural Heritage and Associated Materials’ (2019) 10 JIPITEC 115

Dana Reijerkerk, ‘UX Design in Online Catalogs: Practical Issues with Implementing Traditional Knowledge (TK) Labels’ (2020) 25 (8) First Monday

Alexandra Rivera, ‘Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Competences in the Library Profession: From Theory to Practice’ (IFLA World Library and Information Congress, Singapore, 2013)

Felwine Sarr and Bénédicte Savoy, The Restitution of African Cultural Heritage. Toward a New Relational Ethics (November 2018)

Peter G Toner, ‘History, Memory and Music: The Repatriation of Digital Audio to Yolngu Communities, or, Memory as Metadata’ in Linda Barwick ea (eds), Researchers, Communities, Institutions, Sound Recordings (University of Sydney 2003)

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, ‘Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence’ (Recommendation) SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1

Max J Vetzo, Janneke H Gerards & Remco Nehmelman, Algoritmes en Grondrechten (Boom Juridisch 2018)

Elena Villaespesa and Oonagh Murphy, ‘This is Not an Apple! Benefits and Challenges of Applying Computer Vision to Museum Collections’ (2021) 36 Museum Management and Curatorship 364

World Intellectual Property Organization, ‘Knowledge and Folklore (Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore)’ https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/igc/ accessed 24 May 2024

Karen Yeung, ‘Towards an Understanding of Regulation by Design’ in Roger Brownsword and Karen Yeung (eds.), Regulating Technologies. Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Hart Publishing 2008)

Gregory Younging, ‘Gnaritas Nullius (No One’s Knowledge): The Essence of Traditional Knowledge and Its Colonization Through Western Legal Regimes’ in Patricia W Elliot and Daryl H Hepting (eds) Free Knowledge. Confronting the Commodification of Human Discovery (University of Regina Press 2015)