All Rise for the Honourable Robot Judge?
Using Artificial Intelligence to Regulate AI: a debate
Keywords:Ai, robojudge, robot judge, jurisprudence, legal theory
There is a rich literature on the challenges that AI poses to the legal order. But to what extent might such systems also offer part of the solution? China, which has among the least developed rules to regulate conduct by AI systems, is at the forefront of using that same technology in the courtroom. This is a double-edged sword, however, as its use implies a view of law that is instrumental, with parties to proceed- ings treated as means rather than ends. That, in turn, raises fundamental questions about the nature of law and authority: at base, whether law is reducible to code that can optimize the human condition, or if it must remain a site of contestation, of politics, and inextricably linked to institutions that are themselves account- able to a public. For many of the questions raised, the rational answer will be sufficient; but for others, what the answer is may be less important than how and why it was reached, and whom an affected population can hold to account for its consequences.
This contribution is follwed by comments by Lyria Bennett Moses and Ugo Pagallo
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Simon Chesterman, Lyria Bennett Moses, Ugo Pagallo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submissions are published under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND license.’