Announcements

Current Issue

Vol. 2024 (2024)
Published: 18-03-2024

Special Issue: Data, Law and Decolonisation

  • Decolonial Data Law and Governance

    Siddharth Peter de Souza, Hellen Mukiri Smith, Linnet Taylor
    1-11

    In the introduction to this special issue, we propose a decolonial take on data law and governance across three aspects through the dismantling of hegemonic structures, the embracing of pluriversality and finally the decentering of data and technology. The special issue covers papers that discuss a) what decolonisation means in relation to data law and governance for the digital economy, b) what kinds of methods should be employed to develop data governance frameworks that account for different infrastructural, social, and political contexts, and c) vocabularies and imaginations for how to regulate data, from the majority world. The papers are written from different disciplinary backgrounds of law, science, and technology studies, governance and policy, as well as media studies and present different points of view, and different entry points into the debate. In this piece, we explore ways to place them in dialogue as a plural whole.

  • Is the Brussels Effect Creating a New Legal Order in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean?

    Patricia Boshe, Carolina Goberna Caride
    12-18

    EU Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR), like the pied piper of Hamelin, has and continues to lure third countries into approximating the EU data protection framework.  Some scholars believe the approximation of the EU framework, mostly done in a one-size-fits-all fashion, may not be appropriate in non-EU contexts mainly because (some) values advanced by the EU data protection framework may vary from or be incompatible with legal cultures and/or social norms of the recipient country/region. This paper looks into data protection in Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean (hereinafter LAC). The focus is on the evolution, influence and role of the EU in the development of data protection laws in Africa and LAC. The purpose is to ascertain whether and to what extent those laws are a result of the Brussels effect

  • Constitutionalism as a Way to Decolonize Global Data Law Development

    Anushka Mittal
    19-27

    Data governance is being explored across all possible avenues, ranging from domestic laws, private standards to international treaties. Amidst this din, there are also constitutional contributions at different points of time with the potential to lay down the first principles for future adjudication and law making. This article analyses the legal histories of constitutions and landmark decisions related to public biometric use in India and South Africa to identify decolonial specificities. Global governance of data has the potential to spiral into international law making with states as the unit, without acknowledging the power differentials that exist within a state. It is time that the plurality of interests within nations are accommodated in the development of technology, as the architecture of the future. For the same, the article identifies global constitutionalism as the means through which any discussion of a global data law should be approached, taking into account the decolonial consensus in post-colonial states and its contemporary use in technological debates.

  • Towards a Human-Centred Approach to Data Extraction

    Edmund Terem Ugar
    28-36

    Ethical principles, such as privacy, autonomy, and human rights, have been published to govern ethical data extraction and mining. These principles aim to protect individuals from unlawful data extraction for research, development, and other purposes. While these principles are necessary to protect individuals against unlawful data extraction and mining, I argue that they do not, in practice, provide solid foundations for a human-centred approach to data extraction, given the exponential growth of surveillance capitalism and data colonialism. I contend that it is best to reorient data-driven corporations to approach data extraction from a human-centred perspective, guided by collectivist principles, such as care, human dignity, and beneficence, which I develop from Ubuntu-centred African relational moral theory. I show how these principles can contest current principles, such as respect for autonomy, privacy, and human rights, to guide a human-centred approach to data extraction.

  • Critical Data Governance A Southern Standpoint to the study and practice of data

    Preeti Raghunath
    37-46

    Much of the conversations and practices of data governance emanate from technocratic and/or managerial lenses. This suggests a double bias towards (a) a linear teleological model of progress, (b) propelled by claims of objectivity and pristine scientific rationality inherent to Data. This paper seeks to move away from such approaches, to draw on the offerings of Critical Theory, to develop Critical Data Governance (CDG) as an approach that eschews objectivist, instrumentalist, and universalising tendencies. This, it does, by bringing to conversation the bodies of work on Critical Policy Studies and Critical Data Studies, in order to bring to the fore a multiplicity of policy actors, norms and values, interests and interactions, venues and deliberative sites, to the study of data governance and policymaking. Towards this, the paper showcases some examples from the South(s), and then moves on to present a provocation for CDG as a Southern Standpoint for Data, overcoming the inadequacies of Critical Theory and catering to anti-/de-colonial and anti-caste aspirations of peoples.

  • A Tactics of Earthy Data Decolonising for the Anthropocene

    diane U+16DE
    47-62

    As climate change accelerates and the exploitation of the Earth and its peoples through the use of digital technologies deepens, what does it mean to demand decolonising in the context of data governance? The present article centres this question to develop an account of colonialism against the backdrop of law and policy discourses on data governance in the ‘Anthropocene.’ The central argument is as follows: That colonialism (and relatedly, decolonising) in the context of data governance should be understood as shaping not only the access to and distribution of data between the global North and Souths and between the powerful and the dispossessed, but also importantly, its production. Additionally, that such account of colonialism necessarily involves an account of the exploitation of the land to produce data.

    In making this argument, the article seeks to distinguish its understanding of colonial operations in the context of data value chains from that of ‘data colonialism,’ a concept that has been influential in the past decade within settler discourses. In this latter account, data colonialism has been cast as a discontinuity and a relatively recent development in the longer history of colonialism. By contrast, I argue against such discontinuity proposing that decolonising data governance would mean accounting not just for the oppressions and exclusions embedded in the access and distribution of data but also those power relations embedded within data production, whereby the latter includes the exploitation of the land. Such accounting of the exploitation of lands as part of the power relations embedded within the production of data becomes highly relevant with the deepening exploitation of the Earth and her peoples in the ‘Anthropocene.‘

    The article draws upon Indigenous scholarship on land, knowledge, and decolonising in the form of the Place-Thought framework to critique the law and policy discourses of data governance in the intertwined discussions on data colonialism, human rights, and data justice. Through this analysis, I propose that data should be considered not only as an immaterial object of governance, but rather mapped as a material relationship between people and the land against the backdrop of the extractive relationship between global North and Souths. Specifically, I consider the figure of the microchip that plays a key role in the production of data in the digital Earth today and map big data as relations of capitalist production that manifest through extraction of minerals from the land along with the extraction of labour from racialised bodies for the creation of these devices. Based on such mapping, I argue that understanding data in context of relations of production which account for land-based extraction can contribute to the decolonising data governance for the ‘Anthropocene.‘

  • Ngugi and Mazrui in Digitalization Policy Practitioner Insights into The Role of Language in Decolonising Digitalisation Policy

    Nanjala Nyabola
    63-72

    Digitalisation of public service provision has been and remains a pillar of the Kenyan government’s approach to development. Kenya has explicitly linked digitalisation to its ambitions for development – an approach that is echoed in the political campaign materials produced and distributed by all major political parties in the country. Yet the country’s digital policy continues to be developed primarily in English, as the countries continues to build and also receive digital technologies built elsewhere, primarily in English. This paper argues that in the context of postcolonial societies like Kenya and Tanzania, this has a distinct impact of deepening power differentials within the society that are rooted in ‘coloniality’ as defined by Grosfoguel. The use of colonial languages in the creation and dissemination of digital policy is an obstacle to decolonising the internet in postcolonial societies.
    Building from Ngugi’s work on indigenous languages in public life, the paper argues that to properly map the terrain of decolonial praxis in technology, we must engage with the power differentials embedded in how languages are perceived and experienced in postcolonial societies. Languages, the paper argues, are not only a key component of colonial violence as Ngugi argued, but they also perpetuate the power disparities of incomplete decolonisation, including for example the perception of those who speak indigenous languages as their index language as being lower class and therefore more abstract to power. The paper then summarises a project developed by the author to create a lexicon for digital rights in Kiswahili as an example of some of the decolonial praxis that is necessary to addressing these power disparities in countries like Kenya and Tanzania. In this way, the paper not only proposes a theoretical argument for decolonisation but also offers a practical example of what meaningful decolonial praxis of digital technologies can look like. Overall, the paper argues that decolonisation of digital technologies is imperative to addressing the coloniality embedded in digitalisation policy in Kenya.

  • Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Brazil the contributions of critical social theory to rethink principles

    Hana Mesquita, Marina Garrote , Rafael Zanatta
    73-83

    This essay discusses how critical social theory in Brazil can contribute to a revision of dominant approaches to AI regulation and a regulatory strategy focused on innovation, legal certainty, and economic development in Brazil. We explain the origins of the Brazilian Draft Bill on Artificial Intelligence Regulation and the main critiques during the discussions at the legislative houses in 2022. We argue that critical social theory can enlarge the discussion about which should be the regulatory goals of such legislation. Critical theory helps envision new principles that are connected to the structural problems of post-colonial societies. We intend to advance the project of enlarging the epistemologies of the South and expanding the view of Global Data Justice that relates to the social theory developed in the South.

  • The Double Helix of Data Extraction Radicalising Reflexivity in Critical Data Studies

    Sebastián Lehuedé
    84-92

    The increasing value of data is rendering data extraction ubiquitous. Looking at recent research, I argue that work critical of extractive dynamics can give rise to a ‘double-helix of data extraction’ that exacerbates existing asymmetries by appropriating the means of critique of affected populations. I show how this dynamic might play out in practice by turning to my research on astronomy data in Chile, which adopted a decolonial lens and involved Indigenous activists. Finally, a radical embracement of reflexivity attentive to both positionality and political economy is advocated as a condition for conducting properly critical data studies (CDS), especially in the case of research relying on decolonial approaches. Although reflexivity cannot solve the double helix, it can expose the conditions underpinning research and acknowledge the limitations of research on its own.

  • Data as a national asset What does seeing data in terms of an asset reveal about postcolonial state in India?

    Kushang Mishra
    93-102

    The Indian state has tried to project an image of data sovereignty, seeing data in terms of a national asset that needs to be protected against the data colonialism of Western Big Tech through various policy documents and rhetoric. In this paper, I have tried to analyse this claim and tried to unravel how it sees data and defines data colonialism, unravelling the role which the Indian private sector plays in supporting that vision. I have then compared it with the work of decolonial scholars who have critically examined the impact of Big Data from the lens of data colonialism to argue how it fails to challenge the epistemological basis of data colonialism even as it projects to fight it.

View All Issues

Technology and Regulation (TechReg) is a new interdisciplinary journal of law, technology and society. TechReg provides an open-access platform for disseminating original research on the legal and regulatory challenges posed by existing and emerging technologies.

The Editor-in-Chief is Professor Ronald Leenes of the Tilburg Law School. Our Editorial Board Committee comprises a distinguished panel of international experts in law, regulation, technology and society across different disciplines and domains.

TechReg aspires to become the leading outlet for scholarly research on technology and regulation topics, and has been conceived to be as accessible as possible for both authors and readers.